Teaching Ethnic Dance: The Raqs
Sharqi Experience
By Zarifa Sa'id July 1998
I was recently invited to be a guest instructor in a class in World
Dance in the University of Florida's Theatre and Dance Department.
This summer class consisted of five weeks. Each week contained four
days of one and one-half hour instruction. What was unusual was that
each week featured a different culture. The session began with Barata
Natayam, followed by Middle Eastern, Chinese, Spanish and Brazilian.
The guest teachers were invited to attend all of the classes as
observers. We had a preliminary meeting where the instructors met each
other and the students and where we each introduced ourselves, relayed
our credentials and introduced the dance form we would teach.
Some things became painfully clear, both as a result of that meeting
and as a result of observing the development of the Barata Natayam
class. First of all, I would be the only one teaching an
"ethnic" dance for which there is no teaching technique
developed to teach the "ethnics" of the countries where the
dance originates. This is not to say that there are no classes. There
are some for the dedicated and aspiring performer who can search out
Master practioners or troupe directors for lessons in choreography and
presentation. There is no curriculum, however, which takes a dancer
from the basics through advanced step technique, integrating
choreographies into the lessons as appropriate for each level. There
is no method of instruction that lays out a definition of what
constitutes Raqs Sharqi as compared to other dance forms. There is no
description of the boundaries of this dance form although master
teachers in that country have a clear idea in mind about what is
"Oriental" and what is Western dance, such as ballet. In
addition, a variety of styles exist each of which grew out of the
specific experience of a particular country, region, village's efforts
to express movement in response to rhythm. Some styles contain more
twisting movement; some more up and down hip movements; some more
upper body movement than others. While these styles might be
identifiable by observers, the stylistic differences have not been
articulated by the peoples of those locations with some few possible
exceptions (Tunisian folkloric, for example). Finally, a further
complication is that "ethnic" choreographers have in recent
decades been strongly influenced by Western dance forms, especially
ballet, in their staging of folkloric and even "Oriental"
dances.
In addition to the above difficulties, I was confronted with
precocious students who were well trained in ballet, modern and jazz
technique but who had almost no exposure to ethnic dance of any kind.
The realization dawned on me that I could not rely on the usual
approach which I use in my classes that continue for weeks or even the
approach used in Belly Dance workshops where most people have some
idea of what we're doing. I had to succinctly explain to them what we
in Twentieth Century America are doing with this dance form, how to
identify it and how to do it, as well as how this relates to how the
"ethnics" perform this dance form and its function in those
societies. The problem was compounded for me by the fact that the
program director had introduced me as teaching "Egyptian"
dance. The confusion about what constitutes "Egyptian" dance
that currently exists in our field due to a wave of interest in that
styling did nothing to heighten my self confidence in presenting
myself to this class.
There are two main topics that I tried to explain to these students:
the development of a Western teaching method for Raqs Sharqi--what it
is and how it changed the dance-and an explanation of how one might
define Raqs Sharqi. My discussion of these topics is strictly an
outgrowth of my personal experience rather than the result of
extensive academic study. I'd like to share my discussion of these
topics to help clarify (obfuscate?) what we are doing. I am not
attempting to write a history of the introduction of belly dance into
the U. S. nor am I attempting to give credit to everyone who made
major contributions to that introduction. I am tracing what I consider
to be an important influence in the way that belly dance teaching
methods developed in this country and what effect that had on the way
that we in the U. S. perform Raqs Sharqi or Belly Dance.
The development of a teaching method for Raqs Sharqi occurred largely
in the early 1970's. The 1960's had been a period where ethnic night
clubs flourished and the Middle Eastern clubs featured "Belly
Dancers". Many of the dancers during that time period were ethnic
- from Turkey, Greece, Lebanon and Syria. The '60's were also a period
of social change in the U. S. - the feminist movement developed along
with the "sexual revolution". Flower children may have
heralded the way, but in the early seventies American women discovered
"Belly Dance". It became one way for women to discover
themselves, and women flocked to newly opened studios that taught only
belly dance - for exercise and fun. I remember the Scheherezade School
of Belly Dance on one of the main streets in Tucson. There were veils
hung from the ceiling and across the front window. I sort of crept in
the door, hoping no one would see me. But I became hooked and even
practiced my finger cymbals while waiting at bus stops. In those days
there were 40 people in a beginner class and we paid more than I can
charge for classes today!
Sometime in the early 70's, Aisha Ali and Leona Wood conducted field
research in Egypt, Tunisia and Morocco and brought the music, steps
and dances back to the U. S. Aisha taught workshops to share that
information that focused primarily on Egyptian Ghawazee and Tunisian
Folkloric dance, as well as danse orientale. In addition, Jamila
Salimpour developed a teaching format based on her experience working
in night clubs with dancers of varied ethnic backgrounds. The teaching
format included steps and technique which introduced Raqs Sharqi to
western dancers. As a method for teaching beginners and for teaching
layering of isolation movements to advanced students, this method has
possibly been the greatest influence in the teaching of American Belly
Dancers. The teaching method included steps and technique from Egypt,
Lebanon, Tunisia, Morocco and Turkey which were blended into what I
now call "generic Raqs Sharqi". In addition, the hip
movements were taught as coming from pressure points in the feet. The
dance resulting from instruction in this technique resulted in quite
beautiful movements and credibly "authentic" presentations.
By this I mean, that when I had an opportunity to dance with Shaadia
Maazin on a cruise boat in Luxor in 1981, I used the technique I had
learned from students of Jamila and from a week long workshop with
Jamila. The Egyptian audience and the folk musicians who accompanied
Shaadia complemented me. They accepted what I had done as a reasonable
representation of the dance that Shadia was doing which was folkloric
style raqs sharqi.
There are a couple of issues to discuss with regards to the way
"generic Raqs Sharqi" is taught. One has to do with the way
dance movements are transmitted from a different culture. We tend to
filter movements through the prism of our own experience with
movement, just as we filter our understanding of other cultural
elements based on our own cultural expressions. In Western culture,
dance is primarily expressed through movements of the arms and legs
and by creating visual images in space. In Middle Eastern culture Raqs
Sharqi is performed by movements primarily of the torso to visually
reproduce the rhythmic patterns in the music. In order to teach belly
dance, then, to Americans who had a completely different concept about
movement, music and dance, the use of pressure points on the floor and
the use of the skeletal frame to create torso movements became an
important way to coax a reasonable facsimile of raqs sharqi movements
from American women.
Another cultural difference which makes it even more difficult to
properly teach these movements to Americans is that in our culture we
are taught that the proper use of abdominal and thigh muscles is hold
everything in the surrounding areas as tight and still as possible.
Imagine a dance form that uses those very muscles to create movement!
The problem is that those are exactly the muscles that an Arab or
Turkish women uses to create the isolated torso movements that make up
the dance steps of Raqs Sharqi. I wondered for years how Sohair Zaki
achieved the strength of hip movements in her "figure 8's"
and hip circles. Well, she used her muscles to pull the movement
rather than her skeletal frame to push the movement. This may be a
fine point, but it is an essential point if one wishes to truly
reproduce the movement quality of ethnic Raqs Sharqi. This technique
is difficult to convey in classes made up of Americans and it is
difficult for American students initially to appreciate the difference
in movement quality.
The second issue has to do with performing dances that are true to a
particular styling, such as Egyptian or Turkish. The
"generic" teaching method that has evolved in this country
does not really differentiate between different country styles. The
best we do is to differentiate between folkloric and oriental and
specialty dances such as Ghawazee, Tunisian or Saudi. Are there
differences that can be articulated? I believe I see some differences.
For example, I think that the upper torso movements that we use in
"generic Raqs Sharqi" would be found more in Turkish Belly
Dance than in Arab versions of that dance. Also, Egyptian and Lebanese
versions might use more in the way of up and down hip movements while
Moroccan and Tunisian belly dancers might use more twisting movements.
When I was in Tunisia, I was able to take classes from a couple of
Tunisian women who taught Raqs Sharqi. The styling reminded me of what
we were learning in this country in the early 70's. But that came from
Turkish dancers, or did it? Sometimes I think that there are more
differences between individual dancers within a country, than there
are between countries. Bert Balladine told me that there are no
Egyptian or Turkish dance styles, there is only Egyptian or Turkish
music.
So I end this part of the discourse with a question, as I do in my
classes and as I did in the University class. What is Raqs Sharqi and
are there differences in styles? And, how do we get Americans to learn
ethnic technique or do we care? Part of me says I care and part of me
says we produce a beautiful performance art anyway. The next discourse
will continue with examining what Raqs Sharqi is and with the great
gap in our dance education - the music.
article index
top of page